Alignment Chart

The alignments are a common way of organizing moral, ethical, and general-outlook beliefs of characters. It originally came from Dungeons and Dragons, but the concepts are universal enough that they can pretty much be applied anywhere that one wants to sort their creations based on arbitrary criteria.

And as you know, we here at Blank Points love to sort our creations based on arbitrary criteria.

Lawful Good

 * Yu would be put into Lawful Good, I suppose, even though a more accurate term for him would be Truthful Good. He's always interested in reaching out to the truth, you know. He's got a very strict code of morals for himself, and tends to hope that other people feel the same way, even though they usually don't. Outright breaking the law isn't completely out of his picture, although he will only resort to that if there's no possible Lawful option to get the same result. And he usually feels pretty bad about straying towards Chaos, too. Man, what would the old SMT protags say about him.

Chaotic Neutral

 * Lea is Chaotic Neutral, though he tries really hard to be Chaotic Good. He cares a lot about himself and the people he's close to, but he has a chronic inability to recognize when he's veering too far into amoral territory until it's too late. He then spends days, weeks, months or years frantically trying to make it better. He generally has really rotten luck with that.

Neutral Evil

 * Aeron is Neutral Evil. He's evil because of the streak of Jenova in him that drags him too far into the bad side to climb back out, and also because he sticks around with other Evil people (the other Remnants). He has a lot of problems with Ienzo's absolute adherence to laws, and in fact has inherited a tendency towards the Chaotic, though not enough to be set squarely in Chaotic Evil. He is willing to work with laws if they can be played to his advantage, whereas a Chaotic Evil character would work outside of them on principle.

Sydney

 * Sydney.
 * Ienzo is Lawful Sydney. He never does things for shits and giggles, there's always some kind of rule. When there is no rule in place, he creates some rules and sticks with them. He's both flexible and rigid in his thinking, in that he tries to stick to absolute objectivity whenever he can, even though he recognizes that absolute objectivity is impossible.